Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Handguns do not belong on college campus

Published: Thursday, September 30, 2010

Updated: Thursday, April 7, 2011 15:04

Gun Control

Chris Scott • Layout Editor

The smoke is beginning to clear after last week's shooting at the University of Texas where a 19-year-old math major ran through campus firing an AK-47 before tragically taking his own life.

Fear and shock swept through campus and the rest of the city. It wasn't long after the shooting that people began talking about the unsafe and ill-conceived bill that would have allowed concealed handgun owners to bring their guns on campus that very nearly passed in the Texas Legislature in 2009.

With a new legislative session set to begin in 2010, pro-gun advocates will once again be lobbying for opening up college campuses to concealed handguns. What should really be on people's mind is the question of why guns are so easy to buy in Texas.

Guns on campus advocates say that allowing concealed weapons on-campus would make students safer from both on campus shooters and from everyday violent crimes.

This is a ridiculous assertion especially when you look at the fact that the Texas Association of College and University Police Administrators (TACUPA) said in a statement that allowing handguns on campus would "further dilute the efforts of campus law enforcement to provide for the safety and security of the communities" they serve.

According to TACUPA most crimes on campus are not violent, and students are generally safer on campus than in the community outside of campus. In 2009 TACUPA came out against a bill in the Texas Legislature that would have allowed concealed handguns on college campuses.

Simply multiplying the number of people with weapons is not going to make a campus safer. Concealed handgun carriers are not police officers. Shootouts between handgun wielding students and dangerous shooters are not what we want on campus. City and Campus police exist for a reason.

The real problem centers on why guns are so easily bought and sold in Texas. The answer to the problem of a possible deranged gunman on a college campus is not to have more guns on campus. Instead of trying to get more guns in more places, what we really should be looking at is how and why assault rifles like an AK-47 are so easy to purchase.

A recent report by Mayors against Illegal Guns, a 500-member bi-partisan coalition of U.S. mayors, shows that guns from Texas are being used in crimes all over the country and Texas is one of the top suppliers of guns used in the drug war in Mexico.

Guns bought and sold in Texas are being used in violent crimes across the country and abroad.

The conversation we should be having now is not about allowing handguns on campus but about how we should be enforcing the laws we have that regulate the sales of deadly weapons. We should be asking ourselves if we need new, stricter regulations. Should a 19-year-old be allowed to own an AK-47?

More people with more guns on campuses will not make us safer. Proper and strict regulation of who gets to buy dangerous weapons can have a positive effect on safety on and off campus. 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

Anonymous
Thu Jan 27 2011 15:21
There are more Virginia Tech survivors and who lost friends who are voluntary members of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, than there are survivors who are members (getting paid by) the Brady Campaign.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 27 2011 15:16
Guns ARE the solution to defending ones self against gun violence.

John Woods, attended Virginia Tech when cho shot people.
John Woods lost 2 Martial Arts students to Cho.
Martial arts isn't a match against an armed attacker when you can't grab a magazine.

Government compiled reports show that the majority of the time, Students and staff/faculty are the "first responders" much like bystanders were in Tucson.

Jared in Tucson used those "foot-long" magazines which were easier to grab, whereas Cho, at Virginia Tech, and George Hennard at Luby's used short "regular sized" magazines which were impossible to grab, so each racked up higher body counts than Jared did. I'm glad Jared had an easy-to-grab-foot-long magazine, else it could have been even worse..

Colin Goddard couldn't grab a magazine, so he played possum and relied on the decision of Cho to let him live or not.

A "reduced capacity" or "crippled capacity" magazine is one where you add additional parts to decrease a law-abiding citizen's chance for survival against multiple attackers by limiting them to 10 rounds.

Jared in Tucson used those "foot-long" magazines which were easier to grab, whereas at Virginia Tech, Cho used short "regular sized" magazines which were impossible to grab. So, Colin Goddard played possum and relied on the decision or mercy of Cho to let him live or not.

Soon, those "foot-long" magazines may be banned, so we'll be under the same conditions as Virginia Tech, or Luby's or other places shooters used short magazines which were faster to reload and impossible to grab.

Thanks a lot.

Legislators should perform a proper "diagnosis" before writing a "prescription" which can cost lives.

Anonymous
Sat Nov 6 2010 10:19
Ciudad Juarez is a gun free zone.
http://tijuana.usconsulate.gov/tijuana/warning.html
How's that workin' out for them?
2,600 dead this year?
Thank God Our country recognizes our right to protect ourselves, except inside college campus buildings.
Jarhead1982
Fri Oct 8 2010 04:20
Yet the anti gun extremists don't lie at all right, ROTFLMFAO.

The waning gun control movement is built on lies, and lies on top of lies, and as each day comes and goes, more and more people realize the truth of that.

Good example of a gun control extremists lie, Gun Violence.

A gun is an inanimate object, it doesn't think, can't load itself, aim or pull the trigger by itself so to make any claim that a gun is the cause of violence is the sign that person is mentally ill!

That stage of the mental illness is called Fetishism, a mental illness where one believes an inanimate object possesses supernatural powers.

The advanced stage of such a mental illness is where one believes just by being in close proximity to said inanimate object guarantee's a person must follow the words and commands by telepathy or voices to commit violence, Schizophrenia is a well documented public health risk.

Violence is violence, and guns are not the cause, otherwise all 1.38 million violent crimes reported in 2008 would involve a firearm (only 381k did) and the 9 million property crimes and the 4.8 million unreported violent crimes USDOJ National Victimization annual report 2008.

We see in countries where strict gun control has been implemented Australia, Canada, England since 1997, no reduction in murders, violent crime is the same or increased to twice to five times that of the US rate, all without guns eh? AIC.gov, statcan, Home Office databases.

All while in the US since 1997 9 million more households have a firearm US Census & DOJ Statistics, 27% reduction in violent crime, 41% reduction in murders. All while gun controls have been loosened such that we went from 8 states with concealed carry to 48, and 0 states allowing concealed carry to 40 in restaraunts that serve alcohol all without bloodbaths by the law abiding citizens who are armed.

As to anyone being stupid enough to reference a biased group as the basis for their opine, you must read the detail. See MAIG represents less than 7% of all the mayors in the US, so one has to wonder why if the position MAIG held was such a good thing, why the remainder 7,600 plus mayors haven't joined up?

Then again, the chicken little the sky is falling rant is rather childish and old, especially when if one actually reviews the risks of concealed carry harming you with a firearm, you will find that a doctor is 14,000 to 31,000 times more likely to kill you. But hey, we must infringe on peoples rights and facts be damned right? Florida & Texas CPL database 13 deaths per year for 2.7 million licensee's, 8 million licensee's in US BATF, JAMA 2001 report on Doctors Malpractice in US 44k-98k deaths by 700k doctors.

We also see in other countries and in the US how strict regulation does nothing to stop violence. Otherwise, those 20,000 gun control laws in the US should have eliminated all violence right?

Brady Background Check prevents less than 1% of all felons rejected from acquiring a firearm from a licensed source, preventing maybe 1 death and 8 injuries per year. Especially as over 95% of felons don't even attempt to buy from a licensed source, the only thing the Brady Check reviews. So those 1.66 million plus who were rejected who weren't prosecuted then didn't get a firearm from a licensed source right, lol, you people have no clue! USDOJ Background Check & Firearm Transfer annual report 2008, USDOJ National Survey Felons firearms use November 2001.

Maybe you should review Haynes vs US 85 1968 a US Supreme Court ruling8 to 1 in favor of Haynes that states, no person is legally liable to follow a law that requires that person to violate their fifth
amendment rights. That effectively eliminates 855 of all gun control laws from affecting a felon.

So many more facts and points the idiot gun control extremists refuse to acknowledge

RC
Fri Oct 1 2010 23:21
I was there on the sixth floor of the pcl when the incident occurred. I quickly left and as I exited the revolving doors police were barely entering. The truth of the matter is that we all are lucky. The police response was fast. However, they truly had no control over the situation. The false sense of security is only heightened by the facade provided by both the police and UT. The campus alert didn't occur until a full hour after the first 911 call, and some students didn't even know until hours after the alert. Creating an invisible area of a gun free zone clearly doesn't work.
rfkolbe
Fri Oct 1 2010 16:06
Agreed. The gun industry ($$$) is very powerful with its lies.

They are deeply embedded in our electoral process too.

What is the answer to gun violence: Certainly not more guns.







log out